Indiana's Modern-Day Smuggling and Tax Strategy
Indiana’s substantial increase in cigarette taxes isn’t merely a financial maneuver; it rekindles the infamous spirits of old-school bootlegging. As the state amplifies its per-pack price, policymakers are introducing stern penalties designed to halt smugglers, reminiscent of historic Prohibition-era raids on moonshiners.
The narrative bears striking similarities to the 1930s, where historical accounts describe mid-1930s expeditions dismantling illicit bootleg beer and tobacco operations. Currently, the shift is from hidden stills to multi-state highways and shopping centers, where customers evade taxes by traveling to lower-tax states or seizing bulk bargains.
States like Kentucky and Tennessee offer insightful cases. Kentucky’s exceptionally minimal cigarette tax—just 10 cents per pack relative to Indiana’s lofty $1—has long rendered it a sought-after export hub, with contraband avenues snaking across state borders. After tax hikes in the 2000s, Tennessee experienced a surge in bootleg cigarette distributions near its boundaries, echoing classic "beer flats" but for cigarettes.
Yet the underlying narrative is intricate. A January 2018 brief by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Tobacconomics program assessed the outcomes of states—Indiana included—escalating cigarette taxes by 50 cents or more. Following Indiana’s 2007 increase from 55¢ to 99.5¢ per pack, revenues soared 43% within a year, contrary to neighboring states experiencing moderate declines, indicating heightened taxes improved net revenue despite smuggling concerns.
This is a historical throwback with a contemporary twist, as Indiana zealously pursues cigarettes much like it once pursued illegal alcohol operations. The law commencing July 1, with an augmentation in the cigarette tax, also introduces robust enforcement measures:
Penalizing bulk out-of-state purchases, elevating high-volume tamponers to felony status.
Enhanced task forces—comprised of Excise and state police—scrutinizing shipments at toll booths and warehouses.
Surprise audits at wholesalers and retailers to detect counterfeit tax stamps.
The projected revenue impact is $290 million annually, designated for public health initiatives.
Enforcement Challenges Amid Neighboring States
The test, undoubtedly, lies with enforcement, highlighted by Indiana’s geographical proximity to low-tax states like Kentucky, making it susceptible to illegal trade. A Tax Foundation report positions Indiana among the top ten states prone to cigarette smuggling increases post-tax elevation, emphasizing a “high probability of consumer evasion through border crossing and gray-market transactions.”
Ohio, with comparatively modest cigarette taxes and a dense highway network, warrants observation as well. A 2024 Mackinac Center study suggests nearly 12% of cigarettes consumed in Indiana could stem from cross-border purchases in the initial year post-tax hike.
Lessons from Illinois & New York
Illinois:
Illinois recently increased its nicotine-product taxes to 45% of wholesale, amplifying the threat of smuggling.
Roughly 30% of cigarettes consumed there are estimated to cross state lines illicitly.
Post-2019 tax increment ($1 hike per pack), the state implemented severe penalties for unstamped packages—$20–$25 per package exceeding nine—and intensified scrutiny on high-volume consignments.(turn0news28, turn0search16).
New York:
Amidst some of the highest combined taxes (state + NYC), smuggling in New York has exceeded 50%, peaking at 61% following the latest $1-a-pack elevation.
The Albany-based Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms and the state’s Tax Enforcement Office uphold felony-level trafficking regulations (Class D/E felonies for 10,000+ cigarettes).
Indiana's Legacy of Bootlegger Economics
Bootlegging is virtually ingrained in Indiana’s economic heritage. During Prohibition, Indiana harbored some of the Midwest’s most active moonshine networks, particularly in Southern Indiana’s rural counties such as Lawrence, Dubois, and Orange. Often, moonshine was clandestinely transported at night along "Whiskey Roads."
Today, the medium has shifted from pints to packs, yet the approach remains comparably integral: identify legal gaps, leverage geographical positioning, and circulate goods unnoticed.
Even former Indiana Excise officer John Halverson acknowledged the continuity: “In the past, it was stills in barns. Now it’s cartons in car trunks.”
Public Health Win or Policy Risk?
Not every individual perceives the smuggling escalation as a policy misstep. Health advocates assert that despite some smokers eluding the tax, overall greater costs initiate authentic reductions in smoking, especially among adolescents and low-income demographics.
Mike Seilback, National Assistant Vice President for Advocacy at the American Lung Association, conveyed to The Indiana Capital Chronicle,
“Higher tobacco prices are the most effective strategy to cut smoking, period. We foresee thousands of Hoosiers quitting, with many young people abstaining entirely.”
With potential smuggling levels of 10–30%, studies indicate states can still achieve noticeable net revenue accrual post-tax elevations—provided enforcement measures are vigorous. Indiana’s 2007 experience—a 41% decrease in sales yet a 43% revenue expansion—demonstrates this pattern.
Assessing the Strategy’s Efficacy
Indiana is significantly wagering on this strategy. But the success depends not solely on revenue predictions. Can the state balance deterrence with enforcement effectively? Will small-town vendors acclimate? Will emerging bootleggers—today’s moonshine runners using SUVs and rental vans—maintain their edge?
Time will unfold these answers. Presently, the spirit of the 1930s is alive on the Midwest’s backroads. The stakes are intensified, the transport faster, the tax stamps more complex to replicate—but the scenario? It’s as ancient as Indiana itself.
Want tax & accounting tips and insights?
Sign up for our newsletter.